If mastectomy is part of your plan, whether for cancer treatment or risk reduction, one of the first decisions you'll face is what type of mastectomy. The difference between aesthetic flat closure mastectomy, skin sparing mastectomy or skin and nipple sparing mastectomy is not simply cosmetic. It affects how your reconstruction looks, how your breast feels, and for some patients whether it is oncologically appropriate. This guide helps you understand both options honestly.
Aesthetic Flat Closure
Mastectomy performed with deliberate attention to producing a smooth, well-contoured chest wall without surgical reconstruction. This is not simply "not having reconstruction." It is a surgical approach in its own right, planned from the beginning with the flat result in mind. Excess skin is removed carefully, closure is performed in layers, and the goal is a chest wall that is comfortable, smooth, and livable. Many women who choose flat closure describe the result as freeing — a body that feels chosen rather than compromised. All future reconstructive options remain available. A patient who chooses flat closure today can pursue reconstruction at any point in the future.
Skin-Sparing Mastectomy
Removes all breast tissue including the nipple-areolar complex while preserving as much of the breast skin envelope as possible. The preserved skin creates a natural pocket for immediate reconstruction, significantly improving the reconstructive result compared to traditional mastectomy. Skin-sparing mastectomy is the standard approach when the nipple cannot be preserved either due to tumor location, margin distance, or other oncologic factors, but the patient wishes to pursue reconstruction.
Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy (NSM)
Removes all breast tissue while preserving the nipple-areolar complex in addition to the breast skin envelope. When oncologically appropriate and technically feasible, nipple-sparing mastectomy produces the most natural reconstructive result — the breast looks and, to the extent possible, feels more like the patient's own breast. NSM requires that the tissue directly behind the nipple be confirmed cancer-free either pre-operatively or intraoperatively.
Multiple large studies, including long-term data from major cancer centers, consistently show that nipple-sparing mastectomy does not increase the risk of local recurrence compared to skin-sparing mastectomy in appropriately selected patients. The key phrase is appropriately selected. Not every patient is a candidate, and candidacy is determined by tumor characteristics, not surgeon preference.
The concern that nipple-sparing mastectomy "leaves cancer behind" reflects a misunderstanding of the procedure. The breast tissue including the tissue directly behind the nipple is removed. What is preserved is the skin of the nipple-areolar complex. When the retroareolar tissue is confirmed free of cancer, the oncologic risk of preserving the nipple is not meaningfully higher than removing it.
Mastectomy regardless of type severs the nerves that supply sensation to the breast and nipple. Most patients who undergo nipple-sparing mastectomy experience significantly reduced or complete loss of nipple sensation. The nipple looks normal. In most cases it does not feel normal at least not initially, and often not fully, even long-term.
Some sensation recovery is possible over time as nerves regenerate, and surgical techniques to preserve or reconnect nerve supply are an evolving area of breast surgery. But the expectation going into surgery should be honest: nipple-sparing mastectomy is primarily an aesthetic decision. Sensation is a separate outcome that should be discussed realistically, not assumed.
Aesthetic flat closure deserves to be presented as a first-choice option for patients who want it not as what happens when reconstruction isn't possible, or isn't offered.
Patients choose flat closure for many reasons: because the idea of additional surgery feels like too much, because they feel whole without reconstruction, because they want to eliminate the long-term maintenance that implants involve, or simply because flat is the right answer for who they are. None of these reasons require justification.
Two things matter if flat closure is your preference:
First, tell your surgeon before the mastectomy, not after. A mastectomy planned for flat closure looks different from a mastectomy planned for reconstruction. The skin removal, the closure technique, and the contour of the result are all influenced by whether reconstruction is planned. A patient who wanted flat closure but whose mastectomy was planned for reconstruction may end up with excess skin, dog-ears, or an uneven contour that would not have occurred if the surgeon had known the goal from the beginning.
Second, know that the door remains open. Flat closure today does not foreclose reconstruction tomorrow. Delayed reconstruction after flat closure is more complex than after a skin-sparing mastectomy, but it is available, and a surgical consultation can clarify what is possible if you ever want to revisit the decision.
Aesthetic flat closure may be right if:
Skin-sparing mastectomy may be right if:
Nipple-sparing mastectomy may be right if:
Dr. Palakodeti evaluates all three mastectomy approaches at the surgical consultation: flat closure, skin-sparing, and nipple-sparing mastectomy as a central part of the operative plan. No option is presented as the default. No option is withheld because it requires more surgical planning.
For patients choosing flat closure, the mastectomy is planned from the beginning with the flat result in mind, producing a smooth, well-contoured chest wall that reflects the patient's actual goal. For patients choosing skin-sparing or nipple-sparing mastectomy, immediate implant-based reconstruction is planned and performed in the same operation.
His dual board certification in general surgery and cosmetic surgery means the mastectomy and the reconstruction are planned as one integrated operation. The incision placement, skin management, and reconstructive approach are determined together, before the patient enters the operating room. And for patients who are not sure yet, the consultation is the right place to work through that uncertainty without pressure in any direction.
Please reach us at contact@drpalakodeti.com if you cannot find an answer to your question.
No. It is a different option, one that is right for some patients and not others, exactly like reconstruction. A well-performed aesthetic flat closure produces a result that is comfortable, smooth, and livable. Many patients who choose it describe it as the right decision for them. The measure of a good surgical outcome is not whether reconstruction was performed. It is whether the patient feels at home in her body after treatment.
You are entitled to have your preference respected. A surgeon who dismisses a patient's preference for flat closure or who performs a mastectomy without planning for flat when that was the stated goal, is not serving the patient appropriately. If you feel your preference is not being heard, a second opinion with a surgeon who will plan the mastectomy around your actual goal is worth pursuing.
Yes. Delayed reconstruction after flat closure is available, though it is more technically complex than reconstruction after a skin-sparing mastectomy, because the skin that reconstruction depends on may have been removed. Feasibility depends on individual anatomy and is evaluated at a surgical consultation. The option is not foreclosed. The door remains open.
Prophylactic mastectomy patients are often excellent nipple-sparing candidates. Without an existing tumor, there is no margin distance concern and no retroareolar involvement risk. That said, aesthetic flat closure is also an option for prophylactic patients who prefer it. The right choice is individual and is determined in consultation not by a default assumption that reconstruction is always the goal.
That uncertainty is a completely legitimate place to be and it is exactly what the consultation is for. You do not need to arrive with a decision. You need to arrive with your questions. The plan follows from the conversation.
Sarath Palakodeti DO FACS FAACS
Bring This With You
A condensed version of this guide including the questions to ask your surgeon and space to write your own notes is available as a printable PDF.
Dr. Palakodeti's practice serves patients across the South Central Kentucky and Northern Tennessee region. Newly diagnosed patients are prioritized for prompt scheduling.
484 Golden Autumn Way suite 201, Bowling Green, KY, USA
Today | Closed |

Copyright © 2026 Dr. Sarath Palakodeti - All Rights Reserved.